Best-Fit Type

 

Interaction Style and Temperament Explorer™: How and Why Combo Interaction Style Explorer™—How We Do What We Do Interaction Style Explorer™—How We Do What We Do

| More

BEST-FIT TYPE
> What is Personality?
> What is Personality "Type"?
> What is Best-Fit Type?
> Ways to Describe Personality
> Applications of Type in Organizations
> Role of Type in Career Mastery
> Team Dynamics
> Facets of Type
> Functions of Type


Models of the 16 Types
  > Type Preferences
  > Temperament Theory
  > Interaction Styles
  > Cognitive Processes


The 16 Personality Types

  > ESTP

  > ISTP

  > ESFP

  > ISFP

  > ESTJ

  > ISTJ

  > ESFJ

  > ISFJ

  > ENTJ

  > INTJ

  > ENTP

  > INTP

  > ENFJ

  > INFJ

  > ENFP

  > INFP


Look-alikes
  > ESTP • ENTJ / ENTJ • ESTP
  > ENFJ • ESTJ/ESTP/ENTJ

  > ESFP • ENFP

  > ISTP • INTP/INTJ


Facets of Type

Buy Now at Interstrength.com

 

The Ad Column
What's This?

 

Type Preferences

The following is adapted from Linda V. Berens, Dynamics of Personality Type: Understanding and Applying Cognitive Processes (Telos Publications, 2000) *Used with permission.

Dynamics of
Personality Type

Buy Now at Interstrength.com

Dynamics of Personality Type

During World War II, a young woman named Isabel Myers decided to do her part for the war effort by creating a self-report inventory that would make Carl Jung's theory of psychological types available to more people. At this time self-report instruments were just beginning to be developed. Prior to that time, only psychologists "assessed" personality. Her goals were two fold; 1)help people find a better fit for their work and so make the work in factories and in the military more effective and 2)promote world peace by helping people develop more appreciation for individual differences and how to use the differences constructively rather than divisively. Her work resulted in world-wide use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator® and spawned an industry of professional "type practitioners" who apply type theory to business effectiveness, communication, career development, cross-cultural understanding, education, spirituality and more.

The MBTI® (and all psychological type instruments) report preferences on four dichotomies, with two opposing preferences on each dichotomy.

Your Preferred World or Attitude
E Extraversion
Energized by interaction with others
or
I
Introversion
Energized by solitary activities
Mental Process
Perception - Accessing / Gathering Information
S Sensing
Concrete, experiential awareness
or
N
iNtuiting
Abstract, symbolic awareness
Mental Process
Judgment - Organizing / Evaluating / Deciding
T Thinking
Information/situations assessed objectively based on criteria
or
F
Feeling
Information/situations assessed subjectively based on worth/values
Orientation to the
Outer World

J Judging
Plan ahead and
follow the plan
or
P
Perceiving
Keep options
open to adapt

The following is adapted from Linda V. Berens, Linda K. Ernst, and Melissa A. Smith, Quick Guide to the 16 Personality Types and Teams: Applying Team Essentials™ to Create Effective Teams (Telos Publications, 2004) *Used with permission.

Quick Guide to the 16 Personality Types and Teams

Buy Now at Interstrength.com

Aspects of the Types
Characteristics
Looking at the Preferences
Extraversion vs. Introversion
E/I
Extraversion is being primarily oriented to and energized by the world outside oneself. Introversion is being primarily oriented to and energized by the world inside oneself.
Sensing vs. iNtuiting
S/N
Sensing refers to tangible, experiential awareness. Intuiting refers to symbolic, conceptual awareness.
Thinking vs. Feeling
T/F
Thinking judgments are based on criteria or principles. Feeling judgments are based on appropriateness or worth.
Judging vs. Perceiving
J/P
A Judging preference indicates liking to live one’s outer life with closure and structure using the preferred judging process of Thinking or Feeling. A Perceiving preference indicates liking to live one’s outer life in a more emergent manner using the preferred perceiving process of Sensing or iNtuiting.
Looking at Function Pairs
The columns of the type table list the functional pairs. This tells us the kind of information (Sensing or iNtuiting) we pay attention to and the kind of decisions (Thinking or Feeling) we tend to make.
Sensing and Thinking
ST
Attention to the tangible realities based on current and past experiences with a focus on “objective” facts, criteria, or principles. A just-the-facts approach.
Sensing and Feeling
SF
Attention to the tangible realities based on current and past experiences with a focus on the people and the values involved. A sensitive-and-caring approach.
iNtuiting and Thinking
NT
Attention to concepts, meanings, interrelationships, and probable or possible futures with a focus on the principles and criteria involved. An abstract, problem-solving approach.
iNtuiting and Feeling
NF
Attention to concepts, meanings, interrelationships, and probable or possible futures with a focus on the people and values involved. A growth-and-development approach.

The Type Preferences and the 16 Personality Types

ST
ISTJ
SF
ISFJ
NF
INFJ
NT
INTJ
ST
ISTP
SF
ISFP
NF
INFP
NT
INTP
ST
ESTP
SF
ESFP
NF
ENFP
NT
ENTP
ST
ESTJ
SF
ESFJ
NF
ENFJ
NT
ENTJ

 

 

 
 

© 2001-2010 This Web site contains copyrighted material. No permission is granted to copy or redistribute information contained on this page.
Web site © Unite Media Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Copyright & Trademark Information